Illogicopedia:Votes for Feature

This is for articles; see also: Illogicopedia:Featured images

This section is Logical; it is meant to be. Prepare to be bored.

Sensible Section

This page displays of all the current votes. See Forum:Department of Limelight for a summary index of nominated articles and the other non-article-vote-related things handled there.

Previous article nominations can be found here - or separately, the featured, the ones waiting to be featured and the ones that failed. This category tree also contains all nominated pages and their votes. (useful for checking that the VFF template has been added/removed correctly)

Nomination

Enter the full name of the article below (make sure to use proper capitalization) and click "Nominate", then follow the instructions on the next page to create the entry. If the page already exists, you can either try to fix the "Revoting" option or give up.

Revolting

If you think a previously failed nomination has a chance at winning a revote, you can re-nominate it below. (note that repeated renomination of a page without good reason is frowned upon – a review of the article is recommended) Once again, enter the full name of the article below (make sure to use proper capitalization) and click "Revote", then follow the instructions on the next page to create the entry.

Current votes

VOTING REGULATIONS

There is voting currently taking place below this template, So here are the voting basics: Users are permitted one vote each. Please clearly state whether your addition is a for, an against or a comment. Remember to sign and to update the vote count. Nominations count as a vote for unless specified as "Neutral" or "Against". Take care not to overdo self-nomination. If you wish to change your vote, then cross out the previous using the <s> tags. Frog-infested pineapples are not allowed in the voting area until they have been de-frogged. Click here for more details

VFH/Illogicopedia:VFH/??? (vote)

Score: 0 (0-0)	Nomination by P00psicle (talk) 18:17, 4 Aym 2013 (UTC)
For:
Against:
Comments:

Shrimp paradox (vote)

Score: 3 (3-0)	Nomination by The Bard of Illogicopedia 19:16, 10 Jeremy 2013 (UTC)
For:	For. I read this by accident... and laughed. Then I remembered where I was, became disoriented, was surprised, then glad. Then I nommed it. ~ The Bard of Illogicopedia 19:16, 10 Jeremy 2013 (UTC) For - Intriguingly, this article has been circled around some parts of the world wide web, so in Illogicopedian terms it's famous. The content itself also deserves the not-so-coveted space on the main page. Everybody move to the beat. -- Ben Blade 10:28, 14 Jeremy 2013 (UTC) For - marbury (talk) 08:28, 6 Farbleum 2013 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:

Tom Nook (vote)

Score: 3 (6-3)	Nomination by --Colonel Sanders 12:03, 22 Octodest 2011 (UTC)
For:	Semi Self-nom and for-Gomphog suggested this be nommed, so I nommed it since he was too lazy. It's time to tell the truth about this fascist.--Colonel Sanders 12:03, 22 Octodest 2011 (UTC) For, because I like the way this is written, and it brings back memories of Animal Crossing from years ago. Also because I added a sentence.--Ben Blade 15:35, 22 Octodest 2011 (UTC) Yea. Take down the fraudulent capitalists!--Conservatism XI X MMXI Add an infobox and you have a for from me. -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 18:34, 10 Jeremy 2012 (UTC) Fur - "Tell us the story of how God was denied His fruity cereal." Monsignor Onslow Peaches - Speak slowly into the tube 03:36, 24 Jeremy 2012 (UTC) For - marbury (talk) 08:24, 6 Farbleum 2013 (UTC)
Against:	Nee. Nr. رقم Ոչ: Xeyr. N º. He. নং. No. 號. Ne. Ne. Nej. Nee. Ei. Hindi. Ei. Non. პოსტები. Nein. Όχι. નં. לא. नहीं. Nem. Nei. No. Uimh. No. いいえ. Sincerely, islandmonkey - TALK TO MAH 14:31, 22 Octodest 2011 (UTC) @Berty Island Monkey You forgot ghobe'. ~[TheHappySpacemanDan the Hedgehog] talk • stalk • block • articles 00:49, 10/23/2011 Against because I'm a stingy old bastard and distribute my for votes with the utmost discretion. —rms talk 21:33, 3 Yoon 2012 (UTC)
Comments:	stealing mah jokes, eh Dan? The Berty Island Monkey was mine first! And hating on mah artikles? Write one that's better, m'boy! Govenrment skools dont teech pepl howz 2 rite.--Colonel Sanders 01:48, 23 Octodest 2011 (UTC) First of all, I seriously had no idea you started that joke. My deepest apologies. Have a banana bat'leth. Secondly, AHEM. SEE POODLE AND CHEESES, THE LATTER OF WHICH GOT FEATURED. THAT IS ALL. ~[ths] Keeper of the Bloodwine 22:44, 11/04/2011 No worries, mon.--Colonel Sanders 00:00, 5 Novelniver 2011 (UTC) Ah, foo... you ate the cheese, didn't you? There's no other way all could be forgiven... ~ 00:46, 5 Novelniver 2011 My eyes! My EYES!!! This was painful to look at. So painful, I didn't even read it. Make it pretty! —rms talk 05:01, 15 Jeremy 2012 (UTC) That's partially the result of Hindley's template thingy. Fix the template. I can't.--Colonel Sanders 14:01, 15 Jeremy 2012 (UTC) Should be fixed; we're just waiting on the server to notice that the css changed. ~ 18:03, 15 Jeremy 2012 Nevermind; is fixed. I forgot we're not WMF. ~ 18:13, 15 Jeremy 2012

HowTo:Make a Bird Shut Up (vote)

Score: 1 (1-0)	Nomination by The Bard of Illogicopedia 18:30, 10 Jeremy 2013 (UTC)
For:	For. I find this one strangely compelling and marginally useful. ~ The Bard of Illogicopedia 18:30, 10 Jeremy 2013 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:

IllogiNews:A rebuttal of the State of the Union 2011 as written by a bulimic 15 year old American female (vote)

Score: 1 (1-0)	Nomination by Sincerely, islandmonkey - TALK TO MAH 19:18, 6 Jeremy 2013 (UTC)
For:	For and nom. Like, OMG, this article is the best EVAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! Sincerely, islandmonkey - TALK TO MAH 19:19, 6 Jeremy 2013 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:

An article consisting of nothing more than twenty-three pictures of cake (vote)

Score: 2 (3-1)	Nomination by -- 21:21, 2 Jeremy 2013 (UTC)
For:	For Summarises the concept of cake for me. I'm impressed. -- 21:21, 2 Jeremy 2013 (UTC) 4 ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:05, 2 Jeremy 2013 (UTC) Most definitely. I have no idea how I couldn't support this. Is the typo in the title to be taken as meaningful in some obtuse and discontinent fashion? -— Athyria 04:55, 3 Jeremy 2013 (UTC)
Against:	Against, although impressive, I still have some dignity for the site and enjoy articles with more content on the front page. —rms talk 00:55, 5 Jeremy 2013 (UTC)
Comments:	Dignity? This is ?pedia! Not dignityland! :D -- 10:02, 5 Jeremy 2013 (UTC)

The World Is Going To End!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (vote)

Score: 2 (3-1)	Nomination by Xappa, a noob and true idiot.\Communication 03:22, 6 Ditzimber 2012 (UTC)
For:	For. --Xappa, a noob and true idiot.\Communication 03:22, 6 Ditzimber 2012 (UTC) For - marbury (talk) 05:44, 17 Ditzimber 2012 (UTC) For Although it did fail to end. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:10, 27 Ditzimber 2012 (UTC)
Against:	Against - Meh... 04:19, 7 Ditzimber 2012 (UTC)
Comments:	Wouldn't this be nice to have before December 21st? It's very informative. --Xappa, a noob and true idiot.\Communication 03:22, 6 Ditzimber 2012 (UTC)

Have you ever noticed how when your tired, you think like you're tripping? (vote)

Score: -1 (1-2)	Nomination by 121.220.15.135 22:42, 9 Ditzimber 2012 (UTC)
For:	For high quality stream-of-consciousness page. plus i made an edit to it! --121.220.15.135 22:42, 9 Ditzimber 2012 (UTC)
Against:	Against - Not funny, not much of anything but uninteresting stream of consciousness. Ugly too. Try harder. 03:00, 11 Ditzimber 2012 (UTC) Against - It has potential, but it needs some major clean-up to avoid being just a wall of text. marbury (talk) 12:32, 15 Ditzimber 2012 (UTC)
Comments:	seems i made a mistajke. i nommed Have you ever noticed how when your tired, you think like you're tripping? i'll try again no idea how to fix it, can someone nom Have you ever noticed how when your tired, you think like you're tripping? properly on behalf of me? --121.220.15.135 22:59, 9 Ditzimber 2012 (UTC)

Hipster (vote)

Score: 2 (2-0)	Nomination by marbury (talk) 10:44, 4 Ditzimber 2012 (UTC)
For:	For and nom. marbury (talk) 10:44, 4 Ditzimber 2012 (UTC) For - Stylish cantankers. 02:48, 11 Ditzimber 2012 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:	Lost to time and space, it's not a pogrom, so... eep? 18:36, 5 Ditzimber 2012 (UTC)

Dr. Elvis Steinman (vote)

Score: 2 (2-0)	Nomination by 17:57, 5 Ditzimber 2012 (UTC)
For:	For - This is some of the silliest shit I've seen in a while. 17:57, 5 Ditzimber 2012 (UTC) For - I guess I should vote for this since I did write it. marbury (talk) 07:22, 7 Ditzimber 2012 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:

Teenager (vote)

Score: -1 (1-2)	Nomination by Xappa, a noob and true idiot.\Communication 16:36, 29 Novelniver 2012 (UTC)
For:	for. --Xappa, a noob and true idiot.\Communication 02:34, 3 Ditzimber 2012 (UTC)
Against:	Against - Too close to Holden Caulfield. 03:52, 7 Ditzimber 2012 (UTC) Cake ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:26, 7 Ditzimber 2012 (UTC)
Comments:

BibbStepp195 (vote)

Score: 2 (2-0)	Nomination by Monsignor Onslow Peaches - Speak slowly into the tube 21:20, 29 Farbleum 2012 (UTC)
For:	For - This exquisite, though slightly edited piece of spam exemplifies the potential of spambots written by foreigners. Utter nonsense posing as... something... I bdlieve it has a place in our pantheon of literature. Monsignor Onslow Peaches - Speak slowly into the tube 21:20, 29 Farbleum 2012 (UTC) 'For yes. --Xappa, a noob and true idiot.\Communication 02:37, 3 Ditzimber 2012 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:

An announcement for all you old fogies (vote)

Score: -1 (1-2)	Nomination by Sincerely, islandmonkey - TALK TO MAH 16:45, 12 Novelniver 2011 (UTC)
For:	Cleaned things up, revoting. Sincerely, islandmonkey - TALK TO MAH 16:45, 12 Novelniver 2011 (UTC)
Against:	Neigh - Not front page caliber, more like a .606 Rhino rifle actually. I recommend immediate submission to Uncle Pete for immediate rejection. It'll build your edit count. Monsignor Onslow Peaches - Speak slowly into the tube 04:12, 24 Jeremy 2012 (UTC) It was between against and leaving a comment. I went against because I've tried the whole advertisement/scam thing, and it seemed sort of funny, but it never struck a chord with any of the populace, at least when it came to VFF. Not saying that it couldn't make it, if well executed it can take my pants off in an erotic, illogical rage. Nonetheless, the jokes (?) seemed to flop like a freshly caught fish, and the content itself went over my head like a bridge I just went under. —rms talk 01:32, 1 Farbleum 2012 (UTC)
Comments:	I actually really like it but can't decide whether it deserves to be on the front page. Rather than say nothing, I thought I'd drop this comment in case someone decided to expand upon the concept... -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 11:51, 4 Jeremy 2012 (UTC)

---